ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026
Clinical Interchangeability of 22C3 and 28 - 8 PD-L1 assays for patient selection in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) comprises 84% of esophageal cancers, with a poor prognosis due to late diagnosis and limited treatment. Immunotherapy targeting programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) has improved survival outcomes; however, variability in PD-L1 testing platforms and scoring methods poses challenges. This study evaluated concordance between the PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays, specifically 22C3 and 28 - 8, in ESCC using tumor proportion score (TPS) and combined positive score (CPS) methodologies to address inconsistencies in testing approaches. PD-L1 expression in 198 ESCC cases was assessed using biopsy or surgical resection specimens. Two standardized PD-L1 assays (Dako 22C3 pharmDx and Dako 28 - 8 pharmDx) were evaluated according to the manufacturer's protocols. Staining was independently scored by two pathologists using TPS and CPS with cutoffs of ≥ 1%, ≥ 10%, and ≥ 50%. Among 198 ESCC cases, PD-L1 expression assessed by the 22C3 and 28 - 8 assays showed comparable positivity rates across TPS and CPS cutoffs. Inter-assay concordance was high, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.82 and 0.81 for TPS and CPS, respectively. Cohen's kappa and Gwet's AC1 showed substantial agreement across clinical cutoffs. Inter-observer reproducibility was excellent (ICC, 0.95‒0.97) for both assays. Higher T stage was associated with CPS positivity at the CPS ≥ 1 cutoff (p = 0.012 for 22C3; p = 0.045 for 28 - 8). Notable concordance was observed between the 22C3 and 28 - 8 assays, suggesting their potential interchangeability in selecting patients with ESCC for PD-1 inhibitor therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42771170What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.