ArticleDermatology and therapy2026
Development of a Conceptual Disease Model of Atopic Dermatitis Using Data from the Phase 3 ARCADIA 1 Trial.
Article in Dermatology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03985943 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Nemolizumab in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatients with atopic dermatitis (AD) often experience severe skin disease, intense itching, sleep disturbance, and impaired quality of life (QoL). This study aimed to generate a clinically credible, data-driven conceptual disease model (CDM) of AD using baseline data from the phase 3 ARCADIA 1 trial of nemolizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe AD (NCT03985943).
methodsLatent constructs were defined for skin severity, itch severity, sleep disturbance, and QoL/health status using validated clinical outcome assessments (COAs). Baseline COA data were obtained for the adult intent-to-treat population in ARCADIA 1. Structural equation modelling was conducted to assess direct and indirect relationships among AD domains. Factor loadings were calculated to evaluate COA-to-latent construct relationships, and regression coefficients were calculated to ensure that constructs had clinically interpretable directionality. To achieve consensus on the final model structure, model development and refinement were complemented by a modified Delphi process. Dermatologists with extensive experience managing moderate-to-severe AD and conducting AD clinical trials iteratively reviewed COA selection and latent construct definitions and proposed directional pathways.
resultsCOA data from 807 adults with moderate-to-severe AD were used to generate the CDM. In the model, itch severity has a substantial impact on QoL, exerting both a direct effect (β = 0.427) and an indirect effect via sleep disturbance (itch severity → sleep disturbance: β = 0.702; sleep disturbance → QoL: β = 0.431). A significant bidirectional relationship between skin severity and itch severity is also observed (β = 0.367). COAs show strong loadings on their respective latent constructs.
conclusionsThe CDM identifies itch severity as a central driver of the patient burden in moderate-to-severe AD and supports prioritization of itch and sleep disturbance in clinical assessment, therapeutic planning, and outcome evaluation in AD. Our model, whose validity is strengthened by expert consensus, can potentially guide clinical decision-making and evaluation of treatment responses across key domains of AD burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42771135What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.