ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2026
Identifying potential factors influencing family-building perspectives in adults with SCD.
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe study aimed to identify factors influencing family-building perspectives among adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) overall and by sex, and to examine attitudes toward discussing SCD genetic transmission with partners and doctors by sex and relationship status.
methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of survey data from 91 adults with SCD (aged 21-39) receiving care at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. Participants completed a survey assessing their sociodemographic information, factors influencing family-building perspectives, and attitudes regarding SCD genetic transmission. Inductive content analysis identified themes in open-ended survey responses. Descriptive statistics summarized quantitative data, and chi-square tests analyzed differences by sex and relationship status.
resultsFive themes emerged: 1) concerns about personal health and pregnancy, reported primarily by females; 2) lack of resources (i.e., finances and familial support); 3) concerns about genetic transmission; 4) desire for a large family; and 5) indifference or low desire for children. Most participants reported being comfortable discussing SCD with partners (86%) and doctors (89%), with no differences by sex or relationship status. Among dating/partnered individuals, 65% reported their partner did not know their sickle cell trait status. Forty-five percent of participants received SCD genetic counseling, and 12% of those reported it influenced their family-building perspectives.
conclusionsFamily-building perspectives in adults with SCD may be influenced by multiple factors such as personal health, lack of resources, and concerns for genetic transmission. Further research to understand how to optimize counseling practices is crucial to allow individuals with SCD to achieve their family-building goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42771116What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.