Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771110›Full record

ArticleNeotropical entomology2026

The Invasive African Dung Beetle Digitonthophagus gazella Dominates Pastures in the Threatened Caatinga Biome, Harming Native Dung Beetles.

Clemensou Dos-Reis, Jacques H C Delabie, Federico Escobar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neotropical entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Clemensou Dos-ReisPrograma de Pós-Graduação Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1580-9585
Jacques H C DelabiePrograma de Pós-Graduação Ecologia e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2695-1061
Federico EscobarRed de Ecoetología, Instituto de Ecología, A. C., Xalapa, Veracruz, México. federico.escobarf@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0179-7528

Funding

Rufford Foundation 36296-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The invasive African dung beetle Digitonthophagus gazella (Fabricius, 1787) has been introduced into South American cattle pastures, raising growing concerns regarding its ecological effects on native dung beetle communities. In this study, we evaluated the effects of D. gazella dominance on the native dung beetle fauna in 21 cattle pastures within the threatened Caatinga biome (Raso da Catarina ecoregion, Brazil). We examined how increasing D. gazella dominance affects native species richness, abundance, diversity, evenness, community composition, and the structure of different functional groups. Our results reveal strong negative effects of D. gazella predominance, including declines in species richness and abundance, significant losses in diversity of common and abundant species, and marked changes in species composition. Large-bodied and paracoprid functional groups were especially affected. Although D. gazella is efficient at removing cattle dung, its dominance in Neotropical pastures may drive biotic homogenization by suppressing native species, eroding functional diversity and creating potential environmental and economic impacts. These findings underscore the importance of long-term monitoring of D. gazella populations and native dung beetle-focused management in ecosystems across tropical America.

Indexed as

ColeopteraIntroduced SpeciesAnimalsBiodiversityBrazilCattleEcosystemBiological invasionBiotic homogenizationDiversityEcosystem functioningScarabaeinaeTropical dry forests

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.