Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771091›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2026

Construction and Validation of the Critical Religious Thinking Scale for Pakistani University Students.

Safia Yasmeen, Saba Ghayas, Sadia Niazi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Safia YasmeenDepartment of Psychology, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Saba GhayasDepartment of Psychology, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan. Saba.ghayas3@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5655-0392
Sadia NiaziDepartment of Psychology, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this research paper was to construct and validate a critical religious thinking scale for the university students in Pakistan. The convenient sampling technique was used to collect data from the sample. The scale was developed in three studies. Study 1 consisted of three phases. Phase 1 consists of construct conceptualization through literature review, semi-structured interviews, 2 focus group discussions, initial item pool generation through thematic analysis, and review of the item pool through a committee approach. Phase 2 constitutes a pilot study to assess the accuracy of initial phase direction by analyzing data of N = 108 university students through SPSS-22. Phase 3 consists of exploratory factor analysis on data of N = 511 university students. The result of exploratory factor analysis revealed a unidimensional factor structure of the critical religious thinking scale, which consisted of 8 items with 50.28% total variance (α = .89). Study 2 consisted of confirmatory factor analysis, which was run on N = 300 data from university students. CFA result indicates good model fit indices and confirms the unidimensional structure obtained through EFA. In study 3, the convergent and divergent validity of the scale was established on an independent sample of N = 204 university students to ensure the psychometric soundness of the scale. The results show evidence of convergent validity as peace of mind, curiosity and exploration, and self-efficacy had a significant positive correlation with critical religious thinking among university students, and divergent validity as status consumption had a non-significant relationship with critical religious thinking among university students. Furthermore, the gaps, recommendations, and practical implications of this paper were also debated.

Indexed as

Critical religious thinkingScale constructionUniversity studentsValidation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.