ArticleJournal of religion and health2026
Construction and Validation of the Critical Religious Thinking Scale for Pakistani University Students.
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this research paper was to construct and validate a critical religious thinking scale for the university students in Pakistan. The convenient sampling technique was used to collect data from the sample. The scale was developed in three studies. Study 1 consisted of three phases. Phase 1 consists of construct conceptualization through literature review, semi-structured interviews, 2 focus group discussions, initial item pool generation through thematic analysis, and review of the item pool through a committee approach. Phase 2 constitutes a pilot study to assess the accuracy of initial phase direction by analyzing data of N = 108 university students through SPSS-22. Phase 3 consists of exploratory factor analysis on data of N = 511 university students. The result of exploratory factor analysis revealed a unidimensional factor structure of the critical religious thinking scale, which consisted of 8 items with 50.28% total variance (α = .89). Study 2 consisted of confirmatory factor analysis, which was run on N = 300 data from university students. CFA result indicates good model fit indices and confirms the unidimensional structure obtained through EFA. In study 3, the convergent and divergent validity of the scale was established on an independent sample of N = 204 university students to ensure the psychometric soundness of the scale. The results show evidence of convergent validity as peace of mind, curiosity and exploration, and self-efficacy had a significant positive correlation with critical religious thinking among university students, and divergent validity as status consumption had a non-significant relationship with critical religious thinking among university students. Furthermore, the gaps, recommendations, and practical implications of this paper were also debated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42771091What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.