SynthesisCurrent osteoporosis reports2026
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Outcome Prediction After Osteoporotic Hip Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prediction Model Performance.
Synthesis in Current osteoporosis reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewHip fracture is a major consequence of osteoporosis and is associated with mortality, complications, prolonged hospitalisation and loss of independence. This systematic review evaluated artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models for predicting clinical outcomes after hip fracture, focusing on model performance, validation, reporting quality and clinical readiness. RECENT
findingsThis PRISMA-compliant review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420261414142). Searches of PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and EBSCO CINAHL identified 40 eligible studies published between 2010 and 2026. Mortality prediction was the most frequently studied outcome, while delirium, medical complications, resource utilisation, rehabilitation outcomes and surgical failure were less consistently examined. AI/ML models generally showed moderate to strong discrimination, particularly for mortality prediction. Current AI/ML models show promise for outcome prediction after hip fracture, but inconsistent external validation, limited calibration reporting, incomplete uncertainty estimates and variable methodological quality restrict clinical implementation. Future research should prioritise transparent reporting, external validation and prospective clinical evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42771090What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.