Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771090›Full record

SynthesisCurrent osteoporosis reports2026

Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Outcome Prediction After Osteoporotic Hip Fracture: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prediction Model Performance.

Gaurav Jha, Gautam Chadalavada, Zuhaib Shahid, Gagandeep Mahi, Amit Bishnoi

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current osteoporosis reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gaurav JhaDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK. gauravnancy.jha27@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6362-9276
Gautam ChadalavadaDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Zuhaib ShahidDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Gagandeep MahiDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Amit BishnoiDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewHip fracture is a major consequence of osteoporosis and is associated with mortality, complications, prolonged hospitalisation and loss of independence. This systematic review evaluated artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models for predicting clinical outcomes after hip fracture, focusing on model performance, validation, reporting quality and clinical readiness. RECENT

findingsThis PRISMA-compliant review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420261414142). Searches of PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase and EBSCO CINAHL identified 40 eligible studies published between 2010 and 2026. Mortality prediction was the most frequently studied outcome, while delirium, medical complications, resource utilisation, rehabilitation outcomes and surgical failure were less consistently examined. AI/ML models generally showed moderate to strong discrimination, particularly for mortality prediction. Current AI/ML models show promise for outcome prediction after hip fracture, but inconsistent external validation, limited calibration reporting, incomplete uncertainty estimates and variable methodological quality restrict clinical implementation. Future research should prioritise transparent reporting, external validation and prospective clinical evaluation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHip FracturesMachine LearningOsteoporotic FracturesHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisArtificial intelligenceHip fractureMachine learningMortality predictionOrthogeriatric outcomesPrediction model

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.