Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42771087›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026

Evaluation of the image quality index with MRI motion artifacts on tumor segmentation using deep learning.

Masafumi Akanuma, Keisuke Usui, Ryoma Tsuchiya, Eiichi Maehara, Keisuke Fujita, Tatsuya Choji, Daiki Sakakibara, Hajime Sakamoto, Shinsuke Kyogoku, Hiroyuki Daida

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Masafumi AkanumaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Graduate school of Health Science, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Keisuke UsuiDepartment of Radiological Technology, Graduate school of Health Science, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan. k-usui@juntendo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9941-6341
Ryoma TsuchiyaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Graduate school of Health Science, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Eiichi MaeharaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Graduate school of Health Science, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Keisuke FujitaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Graduate school of Health Science, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Tatsuya ChojiDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Bunkyo-ku, Japan.
Daiki SakakibaraDepartment of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science, Juntendo University, Bunkyo-ku, Japan.
Hajime SakamotoDepartment of Radiological Technology, Graduate school of Health Science, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Shinsuke KyogokuDepartment of Radiological Technology, Graduate school of Health Science, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.
Hiroyuki DaidaDepartment of Radiological Technology, Graduate school of Health Science, Juntendo University, 2-1-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motion artifacts substantially degrade magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) quality and can reduce diagnostic accuracy. Although deep learning-based segmentation has achieved high performance, the degree of motion-related degradation that begins to impair tumor contour delineation and the corresponding image quality criteria remains unclear. This study investigated the relationship between image quality and the agreement of segmentation outputs obtained from original and motion-degraded MRI images in deep learning-based brain tumor segmentation and explored tentative reference values for image quality metrics. Tumor contours were manually delineated on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images from patients with glioma, and a segmentation model was tested. Motion artifact images were then generated through simulation, and the relationship between the generated tumor contours and image quality was analyzed. The tumor contours were evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), while image quality was assessed using mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR). No strong correlations were observed between DSC and the evaluated image quality metrics. However, SSIM showed a positive association with visual assessment, suggesting that it better reflects tumor boundary visibility and perceived image degradation than other indices. In particular, an SSIM of 0.8 corresponded to a visual assessment score of 2 or higher, indicating a quality level at which observers can visually distinguish tumor boundaries. Because these findings may depend on the number of cases and the segmentation model used, further validation with clinical images is required to establish practical image quality criteria.

Indexed as

Deep learningDice similarity coefficientGlioblastomaMotion artifactsMRIStructural similarity index measure

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.