ArticleMolecular biomedicine2026
Fine-tuning the lysine-arginine duet: a dietary approach to suppress tumor growth.
Article in Molecular biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While dietary therapies targeting individual amino acids in cancer show promise in modulating tumor metabolism, the issue of nutrient competition between tumors and the immune system remains unresolved. The current approaches face significant challenges, particularly in the context of metabolic adaptability and immune responses. Here, we demonstrate that the combined modulation of lysine (Lys) and arginine (Arg) balances tumor suppression and host fitness. Using a cross-species approach combining Drosophila and mouse models, we define a narrow therapeutic window for Lys and Arg. A balanced combination (0.5% Lys/0.5% Arg) reduces tumor burden, extends survival, and preserves host fitness in tumor-bearing mice, whereas an imbalanced formulation (0.25% Lys/1% Arg, LLHA) paradoxically accelerates tumor progression. Single-cell RNA sequencing revealed that LLHA was associated with increased B cells, M1-annotated macrophages and reduced T cells, consistent with systemic immune remodeling that may favor tumor progression, accompanied by decreased Rps6 and Rps29 and increased Hba-a1 and Hbb-bt expression, suggesting alterations in mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), hemoglobin, and ribosomal/translational pathways in immune cells. By defining biphasic thresholds and identifying optimal Lys/Arg combinations, this work provides a preclinical framework for investigating how balanced Lys/Arg modulation may influence tumor control and host fitness. This represents a step towards potential future synergy with immunotherapies, contingent upon further validation of immune dependency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.