Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42770861›Full record

ArticleThe Biochemical journal2026

Fluorophore placement and size impact E2 ubiquitination efficiency.

Jashanjot Kaur Gill, Rachel E Lacoursiere, Gary S Shaw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Biochemical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jashanjot Kaur GillDepartment of Biochemistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5C1.ORCID 0000-0002-5317-3090
Rachel E LacoursiereDepartment of Biochemistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5C1.ORCID 0000-0002-3405-2170
Gary S ShawDepartment of Biochemistry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5C1.ORCID 0000-0002-4685-9625

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) 2022-04748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

E2 conjugating enzymes function in the ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis pathway by accepting ubiquitin (Ub) from an E1 enzyme (Uba1), forming an E2∼Ub thioester conjugate, and transferring Ub to a substrate or to an E3 ligase enzyme. Fluorescent or affinity tags are often used as sensitive readouts for catalytic variability and specificity of E2 enzymes and their variants. Here, we examined how the size or placement of fluorescent tags compromise Ub conjugation for the E2 enzymes UbcH7, UbcH5a, and Ubc13. Large green fluorescent protein (GFP)-based fluorophores were placed at the N- or C-terminus of the E2 enzyme UbcH7 and the N-terminus of Ub, and compared with Alexa-based dyes, approximately 30 times smaller, at the same positions. While all modified proteins formed E2∼Ub conjugates, placing a smaller Alexa dye at the C-terminus of the E2 enzyme improves the initial rate of E2∼Ub conjugate formation by up to 10-fold compared with a larger GFP-based tag (YPet) at the N-terminus. In the case of UbcH5a, YPet labelling at its N-terminus significantly slowed formation of an E2∼Ub conjugate and Ub unloading to the HECT domain of HUWE1 when compared to UbcH7. Overall, we find that small Alexa-based tags, especially when placed at the C-terminus of E2 enzymes, are an optimal choice for monitoring E2 ubiquitination using fluorescence-based experiments.

Indexed as

Fluorescent DyesUbiquitinUbiquitinationUbiquitin-Conjugating EnzymesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHumansFluorescent DyesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsUbiquitinUbiquitin-Conjugating Enzymesenzyme activityfluorescence resonance energy transferubiquitins

Identifiers

PMID42770861
PMCPMC13660846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.