Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42770838›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026

Gillespie-based simulation and inference for non-Markovian stochastic reaction networks.

Aurélien Pélissier, Miroslav Phan, Niko Beerenwinkel, María Rodríguez Martínez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aurélien PélissierIBM Research Europe, Säumerstrasse 4, 8803 Rüschlikon, Switzerland.
Miroslav PhanIBM Research Europe, Säumerstrasse 4, 8803 Rüschlikon, Switzerland.
Niko BeerenwinkelDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Mattenstrasse 26, 4058 Basel, Switzerland.
María Rodríguez MartínezIBM Research Europe, Säumerstrasse 4, 8803 Rüschlikon, Switzerland.

Funding

COSMIC European Training NetworkEuropean Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program 765158Swiss National Science Foundation Sinergia CRSII5 193832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discrete stochastic processes are widespread across physics, chemistry, ecology, and beyond. In computational biology and epidemiology, however, most simulators still assume Markovian kinetics with memoryless dynamics, despite growing evidence for history-dependent effects in gene regulation, RNA transcription, cell differentiation, and infection. This reliance on Markovian models limits the routine use and comparison of more realistic, memory-aware descriptions. Here, we develop and benchmark a unified framework for simulating non-Markovian reaction networks using Gillespie-based algorithms. We implement multiple algorithmic classes, including exact, rejection-based, delay-based, and hybrid Markovian/non-Markovian schemes, and compare them across representative biological models. Across three case studies, we show that non-Markovian waiting times can qualitatively change population-level predictions, and that delay-based approximations can break down when intrinsic system timescales approach the imposed delays. We further show how population-level measurements can be used to infer otherwise inaccessible waiting-time distributions, and how non-Markovian structure can be leveraged for sensitivity analysis and statistical inference. To support broad use of these approaches, we release NoMaSS (Non-Markovian Stochastic Simulations), an open-source Python library that provides a unified interface to a wide range of non-Markovian Gillespie algorithms and enables hybrid Markovian/non-Markovian models (https://github.com/AI-SysBio/NoMaSS).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationModels, BiologicalMarkov ChainsStochastic Processesdelayed reactionsGillespie algorithmnon-Markovian stochastic simulationrenewal processessystems biology

Identifiers

PMID42770838
PMCPMC13595353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.