ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026
Teaching Cell and Gene Therapy in Genetic Counseling Programs: Survey Findings and Suggested Practical Resources for Integration.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As cell and gene therapies (CGTs) advance through clinical trials into clinical practice, it becomes increasingly important for genetic counselors (GCs) to understand these therapeutics to discuss them with patients. Despite the apparent need for GCs to obtain CGT-related education, little is known about the training GCs receive on CGT topics in their graduate training. To address this, we performed a cross-sectional quantitative survey of North American genetic counseling training programs. The survey inquired about the extent of training on CGT-related topics as well as barriers and facilitators that influence such training. Leadership from 45 of 65 (69.2%) genetic counseling programs completed the survey. Most currently provide some form of CGT training, although for more than half of the programs, it is relatively new content added to their curriculum within the past 5 years. Most programs provide training on all subtopics explored; however, the teaching methodology used and the number of exposures in each program varied. The most frequent barrier to adding training was lack of time in students' schedules (28.9%) and the most frequent facilitator was access to professionals in the CGT field (53.3%). Despite the consensus that CGT education is important, this study found that many factors influence the robustness of a program's training on these topics, including a lack of consistency in educational content and training modalities among graduate programs. These results and those of previous studies suggest that a centralized resource available to GC students and program leadership could increase access to information about CGT and improve education in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.