ArticleCancer science2026
Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Beyond Driver Testing in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Known Drivers.
Article in Cancer science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-sq NSCLC), companion diagnostic testing (CDx) identifies actionable driver alterations and guides initial targeted therapy. However, disease progression inevitably occurs through acquired resistance, including activation of bypass signaling pathways. Although comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) can identify emerging resistance alterations, its clinical utility in patients with known actionable driver alterations remains unclear. We retrospectively analyzed 227 patients who underwent CGP between June 2019 and August 2025. Patients with actionable driver alterations identified by CDx before CGP formed the known driver group. We also analyzed the nationwide C-CAT registry to assess registry-recorded therapeutic implementation. Among 227 patients, 74 (32.6%) had known actionable driver alterations. CGP identified additional clinically relevant genomic findings, including ESCAT Tier I-III or V alterations, in 34 patients (45.9%), comparable to that in patients without known actionable driver alterations (77/153, 50.3%). In the EGFR-mutated (EGFRm) subgroup, CGP frequently identified alterations consistent with potential bypass resistance mechanisms, including MET amplification, RET fusions, and BRAF V600E mutations. Overall, 10 patients (13.5%) received CGP-guided therapy based on additional findings, all within the EGFRm subgroup, whereas no patients with non-EGFR driver alterations did. In the C-CAT registry, CGP-associated therapy was documented in 21 of 381 (5.5%) in the EGFRm subgroup, 6 of 155 (3.9%) in the non-EGFR driver subgroup, and 195 of 2132 (9.1%) without registry-defined driver alterations. These findings indicate that CGP provides molecular re-evaluation during disease progression, particularly by identifying alterations consistent with potentially actionable resistance or bypass mechanisms in EGFRm NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.