ReviewJournal of Parkinson's disease2026
Clinical trials in late-stage Parkinson's disease.
Review in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Late-stage Parkinson's disease (LSPD) represents an under-recognized and under-studied phase of PD characterized by severe axial motor symptoms, high non-motor burden, cognitive impairment, functional dependence, and substantial caregiver involvement. Despite its major clinical and socioeconomic impact, LSPD seem to be largely excluded from clinical trials, likely due to advanced disability, mobility limitations, and the lack of appropriately adapted outcome measures.To better characterize the representation of this population in research, we conducted a systematic review of clinical trials listed in major clinical trials registries, focusing on studies that included participants with a Hoehn and Yahr stage of 4 or 5. As of January 2026, 353 registered trials allowed inclusion of individuals with LSPD; however, many of these studies applied exclusion criteria related to dementia. Most trials investigated pharmacological or rehabilitation interventions targeting axial or global motor symptoms. Among the published studies (27.8% of the total), only 30% actually enrolled participants with LSPD.Our findings confirm the limited inclusion of individuals with LSPD in clinical research. Broadening eligibility criteria, implementing decentralized or home-based trial designs, incorporating caregiver-centered outcomes, and adopting cognitively adapted assessment tools may foster a more inclusive and patient-centered research framework. Such efforts are essential to better address the needs of this growing and vulnerable population.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.