ArticleESC heart failure2026
Early versus delayed or no empagliflozin initiation after hospitalization for heart failure in the United States: a target trial emulation.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsSodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are a foundational therapy for heart failure (HF), yet initiation is frequently delayed in clinical practice. Data comparing outcomes associated with early versus delayed or no initiation of SGLT2is following hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) remain limited.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study used the Optum de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart and included adults hospitalized for HF between September 2021 and December 2023. A target trial emulation using the clone-censor-weight approach compared patients according to the timing of empagliflozin initiation: during HHF or within 0-7 days post-discharge (early), 8-91 days post-discharge (intermediate), and 92-365 days post-discharge or no initiation within 1 year of discharge (delayed or no initiation). Outcomes assessed during the first year after discharge included all-cause mortality, worsening HF events, and all-cause hospitalizations. Health care resource utilization (HCRU) was assessed using landmark analyses at Days 7 and 91 post-discharge.
resultsAmong 99 738 eligible patients [mean age (standard deviation) 78.0 (9.2) years; 54.2% female], early and intermediate empagliflozin initiation was associated with lower 1-year post-discharge all-cause mortality compared with delayed or no initiation [risk ratio (RR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.69-0.78; and RR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89-0.97, respectively]. Further, 1-year absolute mortality risk was 24.7% with early, 31.1% with intermediate, and 33.6% with delayed or no initiation. Early initiation was also associated with lower risks of worsening HF events (RR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.94), HF rehospitalizations (RR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.81-0.92), emergency department (ED) visits (RR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.82-0.93), and all-cause hospitalizations (RR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.88-0.94). Associations for intermediate initiation were in the same direction but smaller in magnitude. In landmark analyses, early initiation was associated with lower acute care utilization rates, including all-cause and HF-related hospitalizations [in the 7-day analysis: incidence rate ratio (IRR) 0.80, 95% CI: 0.77-0.84; IRR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.70-0.83, respectively], and all-cause and HF-related ED visits (IRR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.83-0.91; IRR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.72-0.86, respectively), compared with no initiation.
conclusionsEarly empagliflozin initiation was associated with lower risks of 1-year post-discharge all-cause mortality, worsening HF events, and all-cause hospitalizations compared with delayed or no initiation, and with lower acute care utilization rates compared with no initiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.