ArticleJCI insight2026
Molecular underpinnings of metastatic small renal masses.
Article in JCI insight, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metastases in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) typically arise from large primary tumors. However, a subset of patients with small renal masses (SRMs; ≤4 cm) can develop metastatic disease. Identifying these tumors is clinically important, as many SRMs are managed with active surveillance, and their study may provide insight into the early acquisition of metastatic competence. It remains unclear whether these tumors acquire distinct metastatic programs or instead show premature activation of the same aggressive programs typically associated with larger tumors. Here, we performed integrated morphological and molecular profiling of a multiinstitutional cohort of metastatic SRMs, including whole-exome sequencing and RNA-Seq, using nonmetastatic primary tumors as controls. Among metastatic, non-clear cell SRMs, we identified NF2-altered tumors, ELOC-mutated RCC, and an mTOR-driven eosinophilic vacuolated tumor. Metastatic clear cell SRMs were enriched by multi-hit aggressive genotypes, including recurrent losses of chromosomes 8p, 9, and 14q, as well as co-occurring driver alterations (≥2 events), including BAP1 and mTOR pathway genes. Transcriptomic analyses revealed enrichment of the non-negative matrix factorization 3 (NMF3) subtype from the IMmotion151 trial-based taxonomy, along with metabolic rewiring and reduced cytotoxic immune effector function. Collectively, these findings identify molecular programs associated with metastatic competence in SRMs, highlight the importance of genomic studies of equivocal non-clear cell SRMs, and provide a biological framework for risk stratification in patients often considered for active surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.