Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42770252›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2026

Motor cortex rTMS modulates adult ocular dominance plasticity.

İzel D Sarı, Vasileia Papakosta, Xavier Corominas Teruel, Hanna Willis, Antoni Valero-Cabré, Claudia Lunghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

İzel D SarıLaboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Paris Sciences et Lettres University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 29, rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0009-0007-4351-4406
Vasileia PapakostaLaboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Paris Sciences et Lettres University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 29, rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.
Xavier Corominas TeruelDanish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Centre for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 36, 2650 Hvidovre, Denmark.
Hanna WillisLaboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Paris Sciences et Lettres University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 29, rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5479-6169
Antoni Valero-CabréSorbonne Université, Institut Du Cerveau - Paris Brain Institute - ICM, Inserm, CNRS, Causal Dynamics, Plasticity and Rehabilitation Group, Frontlab Team, APHP, Hôpital de La Pitié Salpêtrière, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, Paris 75013, France.
Claudia LunghiLaboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Département d'Études Cognitives, École Normale Supérieure, Paris Sciences et Lettres University, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 29, rue d'Ulm, Paris 75005, France.

Funding

European Research Council Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program 948366-HOPLAFrench National Research Agency ANR-17-EURE-0017-FrontCogFrench National Research Agency ANR-19-CE28-0008-PlaStiC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Well-established evidence supports cross-modal interactions of sensory brain plasticity. Here, we extend cross-modality beyond the boundaries of sensory regions and provide first-time evidence in adult healthy humans that motor plasticity influences homeostatic visual plasticity. To this end, we employed repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), known to modulate the excitation/inhibition balance in the primary motor cortex (M1), while examining the impact of this intervention on ocular dominance plasticity induced by short-term monocular deprivation (MD). Specifically, participants completed, in counterbalanced order, two neuromodulation sessions delivering either Active or Sham rTMS (10 Hz, 1600 pulses), during a 90-min MD period. We show that Active but not Sham rTMS significantly increased amplitudes of peak-to-peak motor evoked potentials, confirming facilitatory cortico-spinal after-effects driven by M1 stimulation. While robust ocular dominance shifts were observed for both rTMS conditions, greater increases of cortico-spinal excitability scaled with smaller ocular dominance shifts, suggesting interference of primary visual cortex plasticity ensuing a modulation of M1 excitability and competitive interactions between motor and visual plasticity. These results hint at global homeostatic mechanisms governing adult cortical plasticity across distant networks and highlight the need to consider cross-modal interactions between motor and visual systems when designing learning and rehabilitation strategies for adults.

Indexed as

Dominance, OcularMotor CortexNeuronal PlasticityTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleSensory DeprivationYoung Adultmonocular deprivationneuroplasticitytranscranial magnetic stimulationvisual plasticity

Identifiers

PMID42770252
PMCPMC13594663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.