ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2026
Motor cortex rTMS modulates adult ocular dominance plasticity.
Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Well-established evidence supports cross-modal interactions of sensory brain plasticity. Here, we extend cross-modality beyond the boundaries of sensory regions and provide first-time evidence in adult healthy humans that motor plasticity influences homeostatic visual plasticity. To this end, we employed repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), known to modulate the excitation/inhibition balance in the primary motor cortex (M1), while examining the impact of this intervention on ocular dominance plasticity induced by short-term monocular deprivation (MD). Specifically, participants completed, in counterbalanced order, two neuromodulation sessions delivering either Active or Sham rTMS (10 Hz, 1600 pulses), during a 90-min MD period. We show that Active but not Sham rTMS significantly increased amplitudes of peak-to-peak motor evoked potentials, confirming facilitatory cortico-spinal after-effects driven by M1 stimulation. While robust ocular dominance shifts were observed for both rTMS conditions, greater increases of cortico-spinal excitability scaled with smaller ocular dominance shifts, suggesting interference of primary visual cortex plasticity ensuing a modulation of M1 excitability and competitive interactions between motor and visual plasticity. These results hint at global homeostatic mechanisms governing adult cortical plasticity across distant networks and highlight the need to consider cross-modal interactions between motor and visual systems when designing learning and rehabilitation strategies for adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.