ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2026
Automated skeletal maturity staging from handwrist radiographs using deep learning models: A decision support system based on Fishman's indicators.
Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop an automated system for skeletal maturity staging using deep learning (DL) models of hand-wrist radiographs based on Fishman's method. Methods: In total, 2,318 hand-wrist radiographs of patients aged 8-19 years were retrospectively analyzed. Each radiograph was labeled by experts according to Fishman's method. This assessment was based on 11 skeletal maturity indicators (SMIs) across six anatomical regions, including the sesamoid bone, third and fifth fingers, and radius. Five different DL models (Faster R-CNN, FCOS, RetinaNet, SSD, and YOLOv7) were trained and evaluated. The model performance was assessed using commonly accepted metrics, including mean average precision (mAP), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. In addition, k-fold cross-validation (k = 5) was applied to ensure the robustness of the results. Results: The models achieved mAP values ranging from 0.81 to 0.93, indicating the effective detection of the relevant SMIs. The Faster R-CNN demonstrated the highest overall performance (mAP = 0.93, accuracy = 0.73, precision = 0.74, localization recall = 0.99, and F1-score = 0.83). For individual SMIs, the Faster R-CNN model achieved classification accuracies ranging from 0.45 to 0.90. Similar trends were observed for precision, recall, and F1-score. The ground-truth annotations and model predictions were also presented for visual comparison. Conclusions: All evaluated DL models, particularly Faster R-CNN, showed strong potential for the reliable and automated detection of Fishman's SMIs. This approach may serve as a valuable clinical decision-support tool for orthodontists in growth assessment and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.