ArticleAvicenna journal of phytomedicine2026
Clinical and laboratory findings in patients with castor bean (
Article in Avicenna journal of phytomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Castor bean (CB) ( Materials and Methods: Patients' data including epidemiological variables, rout and amount of CB ingestion, clinical and laboratory findings, and type of treatment were extracted from hospital documents. Results: Twelve cases of CB ingestion, with mean age 29.42 ± 21.19 years (4 to 70 years), 4 children (33.3%), and two elderly people (16.7%), were included in the study. All of them were intoxicated by oral ingestion of CB. The mean number of ingested CBs was 4.83 ± 3.16 seeds (range 1-10, median 5 seeds). The most common complaint of the cases (n = 11, 91.67%) was frequent vomiting, followed by nausea (n = 7, 41.7%) and diarrhea (n = 4, 33.3%). Vomiting more commonly occurred up to the second hour after seeds ingestion and at a frequency of 8 to 21 times. The vital signs of all cases were in normal ranges and no tachycardia, hypotension, or tachypnea was recorded. Also, all laboratory results were normal, except metabolic acidosis (pH 7.3) in one case (8.3%). All cases were discharged in good condition with conservative treatment after 19.5 ± 15.3 hr (12-45 hr, median = 22 hr). None of them reported any problem in follow-up. Conclusion: The majority of our cases were mild. Gastrointestinal problems, especially frequent vomiting, were the most common complaints. Conservative management was effective in mild to moderate cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.