ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
In vivo three-dimensional kinematics in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A sports activity cluster analysis.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The specific kinematics relevant to sports activities after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) remain unclear. We aimed to clarify the kinematic factors associated with sports activities after UKA. Methods: Twenty-five knees that had undergone UKA were examined fluoroscopically during squatting (weight-bearing [WB]) and active-assisted knee flexion (non-weight-bearing [NWB]). Patients who were able to perform deep squatting were included. A two-dimensional/three-dimensional registration technique was used to evaluate tibiofemoral kinematics, including flexion angle, axial rotation angle, varus-valgus angle, and anteroposterior translation (APT) of the femur relative to the tibia. Patients were divided into two groups using hierarchical cluster analysis based on 1-year postoperative sports scores from the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and the 2011 Knee Society Score (low-to-moderate score group [ Results: The sports subscale Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores, except for jumping, were significantly higher in the high-score group than in the low-score group. During WB, the flexion angle was significantly greater in the high-score group (136.2 ± 8.5°) than in the low-score group (126.3 ± 14.2°). In contrast, no significant difference in flexion angle was observed during NWB. Regarding lateral APT, the high-score group showed a more posterior position than the low-score group throughout the flexion range during WB. No significant between-group differences were observed in terms of axial rotation, varus-valgus angle, or medial APT. Conclusions: The ability to achieve greater flexion during weight-bearing activities is an important factor for sports performance after UKA. Level of Evidence: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.