ArticleCureus2026
Large-Scale Large Language Model (LLM)-Assisted Report Mining for Elbow Tendon Co-occurrence Epidemiology: Prevalence, Association, and Validation.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDistal biceps tendon pathology and common extensor (lateral epicondylar) tendon pathology are frequent causes of chronic elbow pain and may arise from overlapping degenerative or overuse mechanisms. However, the frequency with which these two entities coexist on elbow MRI has not been well characterized in a large imaging cohort. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of and association between distal biceps pathology and common extensor pathology on elbow MRI using a large language model (LLM)-assisted radiology report extraction pipeline and to evaluate the pipeline's reliability against independent human review.
methodsIn this retrospective cross-sectional observational study, 51,169 upper-extremity MRI reports were queried from an institutional dataset from 2025 to 2026. A broad, non-pathology-filtered elbow MRI cohort was identified using procedure metadata, yielding 10,222 examinations. Reports were classified for distal biceps pathology and common extensor/lateral epicondylar pathology using a locally deployed LLM (Qwen2.5 7B Instruct via Ollama; Alibaba Cloud (Qwen Team, Alibaba Group), Hangzhou, China) with a structured, negation-aware prompt and constrained JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) output. Prevalence was estimated with Wilson confidence intervals (CIs), the association was assessed with the chi-square (χ²) test and summarized as a prevalence ratio, and effect magnitude was evaluated with Cramér's V (φ). To evaluate extraction reliability, 400 reports were randomly sampled for blinded independent human review, with results compared against LLM classifications to estimate agreement.
resultsOf 10,222 reports, 10,086 (98.7%) were successfully classified by the model. Distal biceps pathology was present in 1,301 examinations (12.7%; 95% CI: 12.1-13.4%), and common extensor pathology was present in 3,818 examinations (37.4%; 95% CI: 36.4-38.3%), with both present concurrently in 696 examinations. Distal biceps pathology was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of concomitant common extensor pathology (prevalence ratio: 1.53; χ² = 165.3, p < 0.001), though the association was modest (φ = 0.127). Human validation of 400 reports demonstrated substantial agreement for both variables (distal biceps: accuracy 84.2%, κ = 0.685; common extensor: accuracy 85.2%, κ = 0.705). Classification errors were balanced for distal biceps pathology, but the model systematically over-classified common extensor pathology (sensitivity 96.1%, specificity 78.5%, McNemar p < 0.001), indicating that the reported common extensor prevalence is likely a modest overestimate.
conclusionDistal biceps pathology on elbow MRI is associated with a modestly increased prevalence of concomitant common extensor pathology. However, because the extraction pipeline systematically over-classified common extensor pathology relative to human review, this association is more likely overestimated than underestimated; a shared degenerative or biomechanical mechanism therefore remains only one plausible explanation. Large-scale LLM-assisted report extraction is a feasible adjunct to manual review for musculoskeletal imaging epidemiology, though bias-adjusted, externally validated estimates are necessary before these findings are considered definitive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.