ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Antibiotic Prescribing Practices During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated antibiotic overuse; however, gaps remain regarding the timing of administration and whether prescribing is supported by evidence of bacterial infection. Methods: Antibiotic use was described within the Adaptive COVID-19 Treatment Trial (ACTT), a series of randomized controlled therapeutics trials in adults hospitalized with COVID-19 from Feb 2020 to May 2021. Proportions of participants receiving antibiotics by trial stage were described (overall, pre-randomization, post-randomization). Analyses were repeated for CDC's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) categories and for antibiotics used for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) according to IDSA guidelines. In ACTT-2 and ACTT-4, lab culture results were documented for Grade 3 or greater infection adverse events; proportions of antibiotic recipients with a positive culture were compared between trials. Results: Most (62%) of the 4074 participants received at least one antibiotic. Pre-randomization antibiotic use declined across ACTT stages, from 72% in ACTT-1% to 32% in ACTT-4. The largest decrease noted is within the NHSN category for community-acquired infection (decreasing significantly from 49% in ACTT-1% to 24% in ACTT-4). Post-randomization use was lower and declined modestly, from 28% to 18%. The percentage of post-randomization antibiotic recipients with a positive bacterial culture was 18% in ACTT-2% and 18% in ACTT-4. Conclusions: Antibiotic use decreased substantially over the first pandemic year; however, in-hospital prescribing remained common despite limited microbiologic confirmation of infection. Stewardship efforts during future respiratory viral pandemics should focus on reducing empiric antibiotic use for CAP-like illness at presentation and on strengthening reassessment, diagnostic stewardship, and de-escalation of later in-hospital antibiotic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.