Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42769961›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2026

Building a Multidisciplinary Cardiogenic Shock Program in Latin America: Outcomes From the TecSalud Program.

Vicente Jimenez-Franco, Jahir Rodriguez-Rivera, Renata Quevedo-Salazar, Jose A Salinas-Casanova, Monica Flores-Zertuche, Cecilia Gocher-Janet, Juan Carlos Ibarrola-Peña, Carlos Jerjes-Sanchez, Rene D Gomez-Gutierrez, Guillermo Quezada-Valenzuela and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Vicente Jimenez-FrancoTecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Jahir Rodriguez-RiveraTecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Renata Quevedo-SalazarTecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Jose A Salinas-CasanovaTecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Monica Flores-ZertucheTecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Cecilia Gocher-JanetTecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Juan Carlos Ibarrola-PeñaTecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Carlos Jerjes-SanchezTecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Rene D Gomez-GutierrezTecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Guillermo Quezada-ValenzuelaTecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Erasmo de la PeñaTecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
Guillermo Torre-AmioneTecnológico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains associated with high mortality despite modern reperfusion and mechanical circulatory support. Multidisciplinary "CS teams" have demonstrated improved outcomes; however, data from low- and middle-income countries are scarce. This study describes the experience and outcomes following the implementation of a dedicated CS team at a tertiary hospital in Mexico. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study including consecutive adults with CS admitted to TecSalud between January 2021 and August 2025. The multidisciplinary CS team was established in August 2022. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: pre-team (January 2021 to July 2022) and post-team (August 2022 to August 2025). The primary end point was 30-day all-cause mortality. Mortality rates were compared using the Fisher exact test. Results: A total of 67 patients were included (27 preteam, 40 postteam). Among the postteam cohort, the mean age was 63 ± 15.2 years, and 73% were male. The leading etiology was acute myocardial infarction-related CS (67.5%), followed by decompensated heart failure (20%). The median hospital stay was 11.5 days (0-122), and the average ICU stay was 7 days (1-105). Most patients presented in the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) SHOCK stage E (33%), 80% required mechanical circulatory support, and 18% underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Implementation of the CS team was associated with a reduction in 30-day mortality from 63% to 25%. Conclusions: The implementation of a multidisciplinary CS team at a tertiary center in Mexico was associated with a substantial reduction in 30-day mortality and improved care coordination. These findings support the feasibility and effectiveness of structured CS programs in complex health care environments.

Indexed as

cardiogenic shocklow- and middle-income countriesmechanical circulatory supportmultidisciplinary teamprogram development

Identifiers

PMID42769961
PMCPMC13591530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.