ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2026
Building a Multidisciplinary Cardiogenic Shock Program in Latin America: Outcomes From the TecSalud Program.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains associated with high mortality despite modern reperfusion and mechanical circulatory support. Multidisciplinary "CS teams" have demonstrated improved outcomes; however, data from low- and middle-income countries are scarce. This study describes the experience and outcomes following the implementation of a dedicated CS team at a tertiary hospital in Mexico. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study including consecutive adults with CS admitted to TecSalud between January 2021 and August 2025. The multidisciplinary CS team was established in August 2022. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: pre-team (January 2021 to July 2022) and post-team (August 2022 to August 2025). The primary end point was 30-day all-cause mortality. Mortality rates were compared using the Fisher exact test. Results: A total of 67 patients were included (27 preteam, 40 postteam). Among the postteam cohort, the mean age was 63 ± 15.2 years, and 73% were male. The leading etiology was acute myocardial infarction-related CS (67.5%), followed by decompensated heart failure (20%). The median hospital stay was 11.5 days (0-122), and the average ICU stay was 7 days (1-105). Most patients presented in the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) SHOCK stage E (33%), 80% required mechanical circulatory support, and 18% underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Implementation of the CS team was associated with a reduction in 30-day mortality from 63% to 25%. Conclusions: The implementation of a multidisciplinary CS team at a tertiary center in Mexico was associated with a substantial reduction in 30-day mortality and improved care coordination. These findings support the feasibility and effectiveness of structured CS programs in complex health care environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.