ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2026
Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration of Left-Sided Intracardiac Masses for Prohibitive Surgical Candidates: A Single-Center Experience.
Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous mechanical aspiration (PMA) of intracardiac masses is mostly described for right-sided lesions. Left-sided masses are typically managed medically or surgically, with limited data regarding transcatheter removal. PMA is currently considered off-label; however, it may have advantages to debulk lesions and reduce morbidity in high risk patients. Methods: We performed an observational study of 7, prohibitive surgical candidates who underwent transseptal PMA of mitral valve (MV) masses. Baseline characteristics, echocardiographic findings, procedural details, and in-hospital and short-term outcomes were collected. The primary procedural efficacy end point included procedural success defined by ≥70% mass removal and procedure-related mortality. The primary composite safety end point included in-hospital mortality, cerebrovascular accident, increased valvular regurgitation, and major structural complications. Results: A total of 7 patients were included. The mean age was 77.9 ± 6.1 years; 71% were women, and the median predicted Society of Thoracic Surgery mortality score was 19.5%. All patients had echocardiographic evidence of large (>1 cm) left-sided masses involving the MV or adjacent structures. The primary efficacy end point was seen in 100% of cases. The primary composite outcome was seen in 14.3%, driven by worsening MV regurgitation. Procedure and fluoroscopy durations demonstrated a downward trend with increased experience. All patients survived to discharge and 30-day survival was 85.7%, with 1 noncardiac death. Conclusions: Transseptal PMA is feasible for debulking of MV masses in prohibitive surgical candidates. In this early experience, the technique achieved success with low procedural morbidity and encouraging short-term outcomes. Larger studies are needed to define patient selection criteria and long-term efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.