Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42769953›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions2026

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration of Left-Sided Intracardiac Masses for Prohibitive Surgical Candidates: A Single-Center Experience.

Haris Patail, Imran Naeem Aziz, Joshua Anapoell, Gabrielle Amar, Joshua Goldberg, Makoto Hibino, David Spielvogel, Faraz Mahmood, Daniel M Spevack, Srihari S Naidu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Haris PatailDepartment of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center, New York.
Imran Naeem AzizDepartment of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center, New York.
Joshua AnapoellSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, New York.
Gabrielle AmarSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, New York.
Joshua GoldbergDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York.
Makoto HibinoDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York.
David SpielvogelDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York.
Faraz MahmoodDepartment of Anesthesiology, Westchester Medical Center, New York.
Daniel M SpevackDepartment of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center, New York.
Srihari S NaiduDepartment of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center, New York.
Syed Abbas HaidryDepartment of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center, New York.
Junichi ShimamuraDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York.
Hasan AhmadDepartment of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous mechanical aspiration (PMA) of intracardiac masses is mostly described for right-sided lesions. Left-sided masses are typically managed medically or surgically, with limited data regarding transcatheter removal. PMA is currently considered off-label; however, it may have advantages to debulk lesions and reduce morbidity in high risk patients. Methods: We performed an observational study of 7, prohibitive surgical candidates who underwent transseptal PMA of mitral valve (MV) masses. Baseline characteristics, echocardiographic findings, procedural details, and in-hospital and short-term outcomes were collected. The primary procedural efficacy end point included procedural success defined by ≥70% mass removal and procedure-related mortality. The primary composite safety end point included in-hospital mortality, cerebrovascular accident, increased valvular regurgitation, and major structural complications. Results: A total of 7 patients were included. The mean age was 77.9 ± 6.1 years; 71% were women, and the median predicted Society of Thoracic Surgery mortality score was 19.5%. All patients had echocardiographic evidence of large (>1 cm) left-sided masses involving the MV or adjacent structures. The primary efficacy end point was seen in 100% of cases. The primary composite outcome was seen in 14.3%, driven by worsening MV regurgitation. Procedure and fluoroscopy durations demonstrated a downward trend with increased experience. All patients survived to discharge and 30-day survival was 85.7%, with 1 noncardiac death. Conclusions: Transseptal PMA is feasible for debulking of MV masses in prohibitive surgical candidates. In this early experience, the technique achieved success with low procedural morbidity and encouraging short-term outcomes. Larger studies are needed to define patient selection criteria and long-term efficacy.

Indexed as

infective endocarditismitral valve massespercutaneous mechanical aspirationtransseptal

Identifiers

PMID42769953
PMCPMC13591522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.