ArticleJournal of spine research and surgery2026
Foot Drop: An Anatomical, Clinical, and Electrodiagnostic Approach to Localization.
Article in Journal of spine research and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Foot drop, characterized by weakness of ankle and toe dorsiflexion, is a clinical sign rather than a diagnosis and requires accurate neuroanatomic localization. Potential sites of injury include the L5 nerve root, lumbosacral plexus, sciatic nerve, and common fibular (peroneal) nerve. Because lesions at different levels can produce overlapping motor and sensory findings, incorrect localization may lead to inappropriate diagnostic testing or treatment. This narrative review presents an anatomical, clinical, and electrodiagnostic framework for localizing neurogenic foot drop, with particular emphasis on distinguishing L5 radiculopathy, common fibular neuropathy at the fibular head, fibular-division predominant sciatic neuropathy, and lumbosacral plexopathy. High yield examination findings include ankle inversion and hip abduction strength, while electrodiagnostic localization relies on strategically selected sensory and motor nerve conduction studies and needle electromyography of muscles representing competing anatomic levels. The short head of the biceps femoris is particularly useful for distinguishing a proximal fibular division sciatic lesion from a typical common fibular neuropathy at the fibular head. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging provide complementary structural information when focal nerve pathology is suspected. Integrating examination, electrodiagnostic testing, and targeted imaging provides a systematic approach to localization and guides subsequent etiologic evaluation and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.