Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42769865›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The indirect association between psychological resilience and prosocial behavior through cognitive reappraisal in Chinese college students.

Chen Jing, Amalia Bt Madihie, Ren Yuqing, Qin Chao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chen JingUniversiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Malaysia.
Amalia Bt MadihieUniversiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Malaysia.
Ren YuqingNo. 22 Kindergarten of Baiyun District, Guiyang, China.
Qin ChaoUniversiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Psychological resilience is commonly defined as an individual's capacity to maintain stability and engage in constructive adaptation in the face of adversity, and its role in promoting positive developmental outcomes among college students has received increasing attention. Individuals with higher levels of resilience tend to exhibit more balanced emotional responses under stress, which may in turn facilitate their involvement in prosocial actions such as helping, comforting, cooperating, sharing, and donating. Cognitive reappraisal-the cognitive reframing of potentially stressful situations-is believed to further reinforce this adaptive response by mitigating the adverse effects of stress. However, the structural nature of the interrelations among psychological resilience, cognitive reappraisal, and prosocial behavior remains insufficiently understood, particularly regarding whether cognitive reappraisal accounts for part of the resilience-prosocial behavior association in cross-sectional data. The present study, therefore, aimed to examine the statistical dependencies among these variables based on cross-sectional survey data, with a view to providing empirically grounded references for psychological health education among college students. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was administered to 411 college students recruited from eight universities across four cities in Guizhou Province, China. Participants completed three self-report instruments: the Psychological Resilience Questionnaire (CD-RISC), the Prosocial Behavior Tendency Questionnaire for College Students (PTM), and the Emotion Regulation Strategies Questionnaire (ERQ). All measures have been previously validated in Chinese samples. Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0. Correlation and regression analyses were conducted to examine bivariate associations among the variables. To estimate the statistical indirect effect, the PROCESS macro for SPSS (Model 4; Hayes et al., 2018) was used with 5,000 bootstrap resamples to generate bias-corrected 95% confidence intervals. Model fit for the proposed structure was evaluated using structural equation modeling in AMOS. In addition, three competing models the proposed model, a reverse-path model, and a common-cause model were compared to assess the extent to which the cross-sectional data could distinguish between alternative directional explanations. Results: Correlation analyses showed that the psychological resilience was positively correlated with prosocial behavior ( Discussion: In the current college student sample, both psychological resilience and cognitive reappraisal were positively correlated with prosocial behavior, and cognitive reappraisal accounted for a portion of the statistical effect underlying the psychological resilience-prosocial behavior association within the same cross-sectional data. This finding suggests the presence of statistical conditional dependencies among resilience, emotion regulation strategies, and prosocial tendencies; however, the nature of these interrelations should be interpreted with caution, given the cross-sectional design of the present study.

Indexed as

college studentsemotion reappraisalmediating roleprosocial behaviorpsychological resilienceresilience

Identifiers

PMID42769865
PMCPMC13591386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.