ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2026
Analysis of the clinical diagnostic efficacy of the novel serum markers lipase F, gastrokine 2 and the collagen X-type α1 chain in gastric cancer.
Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To explore the application value of three novel serum markers, collagen X-type <span style="color: rgb(32, 33, 34); font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: rgb(248, 249, 250);">α</span>1 chain (COL10A1), gastrokine 2 (GKN2), and lipase F (LIPF), in the diagnosis of gastric cancer. Methods: Differential markers of gastric cancer were mined from public databases (TCGA, GTEx). From November 2022 to October 2024, 108 healthy people and patients with stomach cancer who underwent gastroscopy and pathological examinations at our hospital were chosen as research subjects. Among these patients, 60 had stomach cancer (28 in the early gastric cancer group and 32 in the advanced gastric cancer group), whereas 48 patients were in the healthy group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created to examine the relationship between the detection of gastric cancer and the serum levels of markers. Additionally, the application value of both the detection of new markers and the detection of conventional markers (PGI, PGII) in the diagnosis of gastric cancer was examined. Results: Three differential markers of gastric cancer (COL10A1, GKN2 and LIPF) were extracted from a public database. By detecting the levels of three markers in clinical blood samples, the AUC of the combined detection of the three markers (COL10A1+ GKN2 + LIPF 3MP) in the differentiating group (3MP vs PGR: 0.842 vs 0.841) and the early gastric cancer group (0.877 vs 0.843) was greater than that of PGR (PGI/PGII). The combined conventional markers (PGI, PGII) and the combined detection of five markers (3MP+PGI + PGII, 5MP) had AUCs of 0.963 and 0.953, respectively. Conclusions: COL10A1, GKN2 and LIPF are very promising serum markers for the diagnosis of gastric cancer. The joint detection of the serum levels of these three novel markers and PGI and PGII has essential value for the early detection of gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.