ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Peripheral blood T-lymphocyte subsets provide prediction of early postoperative recurrence in elderly patients with lung cancer: model development and external validation.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With the accelerating aging of the population, the number of elderly patients with lung cancer continues to increase. Although surgery remains an important treatment modality for lung cancer, early recurrence (ER) is still a major factor affecting long-term survival in elderly patients. Purpose: This study aimed to integrate peripheral blood T-lymphocyte subset indicators with clinicopathological characteristics to develop and externally validate a machine learning-based prediction model for ER in elderly patients with lung cancer. Methods: This study was designed as a multicenter retrospective cohort study. ER was defined as local recurrence or distant metastasis within 2 years after surgery. A total of 23 candidate predictors were included, and dual feature selection was performed using the Boruta algorithm and LASSO regression, followed by a systematic comparison of 14 machine learning algorithms and 7 ensemble optimization strategies. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), calibration curve, Brier score, and decision curve analysis. SHAP was used to interpret the optimal model. Results: A total of 893 elderly patients with lung cancer were included in this study. After dual feature selection, five predictors were ultimately retained: tumor stage, total T-lymphocyte percentage, body mass index (BMI), Karnofsky performance scale (KPS), and suppressor/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte percentage. After ensemble optimization, SMOTE-Stacking achieved the best performance in internal validation. In external validation, among the four models belonging to the statistically equivalent top-performing tier, Soft Voting Ensemble (SV) demonstrated the most robust performance. SHAP analysis indicated that tumor stage and total T-lymphocyte percentage were the two core drivers of model prediction, both exhibiting clear nonlinear threshold effects. Conclusion: ER in elderly patients with lung cancer results from the combined effects of tumor burden, host functional status, and T-lymphocyte immune imbalance. A machine learning model integrating peripheral blood T-lymphocyte subsets has noninvasive and clinically translational potential and may provide evidence for ER risk stratification, individualized follow-up, and early intervention decision-making in elderly patients with lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.