ArticleERJ open research2026
Emphysema Severity Index: a new spirometric parameter in epidemiology.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Emphysema Severity Index (ESI) is a recently developed parameter describing the curvilinear shape of the expiratory flow/volume curve to evaluate the emphysema contribution to airflow obstruction (AO), as observed in COPD patients and geriatric populations. The aim of the present study was to assess ESI usefulness in respiratory epidemiology studies where spirometry is typically the only available objective tool. Methods: An adult population sample of Pisa (Central Italy) (n=685, 47.3% male, mean age 53.3 years) participated in an epidemiological survey through standardised questionnaire and spirometry (2009-2011); information on hospital admissions was available up to 2017. The input variables for the ESI computing algorithm are peak expiratory flow, forced vital capacity (FVC) and the forced expiratory flows at 25%, 50% and 75% of FVC. ESI is a numerical value ranging from 0 (no emphysema) to 10 (very severe emphysema). Statistics included descriptive analyses, Kruskas-Wallis nonparametric test and logistic regression models. Results: The ESI mean±sd value was: 1.16±0.78; median (IQR) 0.98 (0.39). The ESI was significantly higher in males, ex-smokers, the elderly, subjects with asthma/COPD, and in those with limited daily activities, higher number of doctor visits and hospital admission for respiratory disease. For each increment of an ESI IQR, higher odds of respiratory outcomes, daily activity limitations and use of health services emerged in the total sample, but also in subjects without AO. Conclusions: ESI represents a potentially valuable indicator in epidemiological surveys on the general population and allows early changes in lung function to be identified also in subjects without AO, which is valuable for secondary prevention.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.