Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42769806›Full record

ArticleCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada2026

Fifty years of the Canadian Field Epidemiology Program (1975-2025): Reflecting on the past, shaping the future.

Louis Wong, Anja Bilandzic, Kathleen Laberge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Louis WongRegulatory, Operations and Emergency Management Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Toronto, ON and Saint-Hyacinthe, QC.
Anja BilandzicRegulatory, Operations and Emergency Management Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Toronto, ON and Saint-Hyacinthe, QC.
Kathleen LabergeRegulatory, Operations and Emergency Management Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Toronto, ON and Saint-Hyacinthe, QC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 1975, the Canadian Field Epidemiology Program (CFEP) has strengthened Canada's public health capacity by training field epidemiologists through a two-year, service-oriented model that integrates formal learning with field placements and mentorship. Established at the request of the provinces and territories and modelled after the United States' Epidemic Intelligence Service, CFEP has evolved into a nationally distributed surge and analytic capability embedded across jurisdictions. Over five decades, trainees and alumni have supported outbreak and emergency response, strengthened surveillance systems, and produced applied evidence that has informed control measures and policy, spanning foodborne and environmental events, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), H1N1, COVID-19, and emerging One Health threats. The CFEP's impact also reflects deliberate workforce development through structured mentorship, cohort-based learning, and alumni networks that extend expertise across federal, provincial, territorial, academic, and international settings. As public health risks grow more complex due to climate-related hazards, rapid digital change, and challenges to trust, this commentary argues that CFEP must remain adaptive, deepen cross-sector partnerships, and embed equity, reconciliation, and systems thinking to sustain Canada's health security over the next 50 years.

Indexed as

disease outbreakepidemiologyhealth workforcepublic health surveillance

Identifiers

PMID42769806
PMCPMC13592874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.