ArticleAvicenna journal of phytomedicine2026
Evaluation of the effects of
Article in Avicenna journal of phytomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Menopause is a critical physiological transition often associated with a spectrum of health challenges such as sexual dysfunction, vasomotor symptoms, and increased oxidative stress. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a hydroalcoholic extract of Materials and Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted at Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad, India, during January 2024-2025. A total of 214 postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to receive either ARova5X (250 mg/day) or placebo for 90 days (n=107 per group). Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and post-intervention using validated tools including the Sexual Quotient-Female (SQ-F) questionnaire, the Female Intervention Efficacy Index (FIEI), oxidative stress markers, and anthropometric parameters. Primary endpoints included changes in sexual function, menopausal symptoms, oxidative stress, and weight-related measures. Results: Participants receiving ARova5X showed significant improvements in multiple domains of sexual function including desire (p<0.001), foreplay (p=0.002), arousal (p<0.001), and satisfaction (p=0.004) compared to the placebo group. Vaginal lubrication improved by 84.11% in the intervention group compared to 13.08% in the placebo group. Oxidative stress levels were markedly reduced, with 39.25% of women in the ARova5X group reaching minimal stress levels. Clinical obesity prevalence decreased from 42.99% to 29.91%. Menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes, fatigue, and irritability were also significantly alleviated. Conclusion: ARova5X appears to be a safe, effective natural intervention for improving sexual health, reducing oxidative stress, and supporting weight management in postmenopausal women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.