ArticleBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2026
AOH1996, an Inhibitor of PCNA, Sensitises Breast Cancer Cells to Cytotoxic Chemotherapy.
Article in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: AOH1996 is an inhibitor of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). We have assessed efficacies of AOH1996 as a therapeutic, alone and in combination with representative chemotherapies using breast cancer cells of luminal, HER2 positive, and triple negative subtypes. Methods: MCF-7, AU-565, MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-468, and HCC1143 breast cancer cells were used. Effects of AOH1996, epirubicin, and/or docetaxel on cell proliferation/survival were assessed using MTT and clonogenic assays. DNA damage was evaluated by γ-H2AX immunofluorescence. Results: Single agent AOH1996 treatment reduced proliferation/survival in all cells tested in a dose- and time-dependent manner. Use of AOH1996 in combination with either epirubicin or docetaxel caused significant, consistent and substantial reductions in proliferation/survival that exceeded additive effects for the agents alone. For example, in clonogenic assays using MCF-7 cells, the lowest doses tested of epirubicin and AOH1996 caused inhibition of only 4% and 3% individually, while the combination caused significant inhibition by 34%, representing a 4.8-fold increase on the additive effect. Similarly, using AU-565 cells, docetaxel and AOH1996 caused 6% and 9% inhibition individually, while the combination caused 48%, representing a 3.2-fold increase on the additive effect. Nuclear γ-H2AX foci, indicative of double‑strand DNA damage, were quantified to investigate mechanisms. Combinations of AOH1996 with epirubicin or docetaxel consistently caused significant increases in foci that exceeded additive effects in every cell line, demonstrating that combinations were highly DNA-damaging. Conclusion: Based on our in vitro data, AOH1996 has potential as a breast cancer therapy and causes chemo-sensitisation in combination with chemotherapies standardly used clinically in primary breast cancer. Future in vivo studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.