ReviewFrontiers in neurology2026
Research progress on the mechanisms and clinical applications of neuromodulation techniques for intervening in interhemispheric imbalance after stroke.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-stroke interhemispheric inhibitory imbalance acts as one of the major contributing pathological factors driving motor impairment, rather than a universal primary pathological mechanism across all stroke subtypes. This narrative review systematically summarizes preclinical and clinical neuromodulation interventions including optogenetic manipulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation, grounded in the interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) theory and bimodal balance-recovery framework. We elaborate how these techniques restore excitatory/inhibitory (E/I) homeostasis via regulating neurotransmitter concentrations, modifying receptor expression, and modulating targeted transcallosal neuronal circuits, while explicitly acknowledging inconsistent research findings across measurement modalities, stroke recovery stages and patient subgroups. We further integrate quantitative clinical trial data, effect sizes and evidence grading to analyze current clinical translation status of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS). Critical unresolved challenges include translational gaps between cell-specific optogenetic mechanisms and human non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), heterogeneous patient responses, and lack of unified quantitative thresholds defining pathological interhemispheric imbalance. Finally, we propose prospective research directions covering multi-network targeted modulation, multimodal predictive biomarkers, combined pharmacology-neuromodulation strategies and large stratified randomized controlled trials to advance precision individualized stroke neurorehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.