ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2026
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Assessing the Effects of Focal and Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Pain and Function in Patellar Tendinopathy.
Review in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of focal or radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) in improving pain and function in individuals with patellar tendinopathy (PT) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Data Sources: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science up to May 27, 2025. Search terms were related to ESWT and PT. Additional gray literature was assessed using Google Scholar. Study Selection: Studies were included if they used focused or radial ESWT to treat PT and reported pre- and posttreatment outcomes using the visual analog scale (VAS) and/or the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment (VISA). Randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, and retrospective chart reviews were eligible. Thirteen studies (n=530 for VAS; n=369 for VISA) met the inclusion criteria. Data Extraction: Two authors independently extracted VAS, VISA, SDs, and sample sizes. Data from 12- to 16-week follow-up were prioritized when multiple follow-up points were reported. Data Synthesis: A random-effects meta-analysis was performed across 13 studies totaling 899 participants (530 for VAS, 369 for VISA). ESWT demonstrated a significant VAS reduction of 2.53 (from 5.24 to 2.71) and VISA increase of 20.22 (from 54.65 to 74.86), both exceeding minimal clinically important difference thresholds (VAS: 1.2; VISA: 7.3). Effect sizes were large (VAS Conclusions: ESWT significantly reduces pain and improves function in patients with PT, with effect sizes exceeding clinically meaningful thresholds. It represents a viable noninvasive treatment option for individuals not responding to conservative care. Future research should focus on standardizing ESWT protocols and follow-up intervals to enhance reproducibility and clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.