Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42769678›Full record

ArticleDigital discovery2026

moTSart: accelerating automated transition state search with generative models in a low-data regime.

Leonard Galustian, Johannes Karwounopoulos, Tori Demuth, Jasper De Landsheere, Konstantin Mark, Maximilian P-P Kovar, Anton Zamyatin, Dennis Svatunek, Esther Heid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital discovery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Leonard GalustianInstitute of Materials Chemistry, TU Wien A-1060 Vienna Austria esther.heid@tuwien.ac.at.
Johannes KarwounopoulosInstitute of Materials Chemistry, TU Wien A-1060 Vienna Austria esther.heid@tuwien.ac.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0172-863X
Tori DemuthInstitute of Applied Synthetic Chemistry, TU Wien A-1060 Vienna Austria.
Jasper De LandsheereInstitute of Materials Chemistry, TU Wien A-1060 Vienna Austria esther.heid@tuwien.ac.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5958-117X
Konstantin MarkInstitute of Materials Chemistry, TU Wien A-1060 Vienna Austria esther.heid@tuwien.ac.at.
Maximilian P-P KovarInstitute of Materials Chemistry, TU Wien A-1060 Vienna Austria esther.heid@tuwien.ac.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2321-1656
Anton ZamyatinInstitute of Materials Chemistry, TU Wien A-1060 Vienna Austria esther.heid@tuwien.ac.at.
Dennis SvatunekInstitute of Applied Synthetic Chemistry, TU Wien A-1060 Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1101-2376
Esther HeidInstitute of Materials Chemistry, TU Wien A-1060 Vienna Austria esther.heid@tuwien.ac.at.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8404-6596

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transition states (TSs) are first-order saddle points on the potential energy surface, and thus the highest-energy structure on the (multi-step) minimum-energy reaction pathway that corresponds to a chemical reaction, determining the rate at which it proceeds. Locating TSs and thus elucidating reaction mechanisms is a computationally demanding and expertise-driven task. Recent automation strategies leverage heuristic rules or deep learning models to directly arrive at TS geometries from textual SMILES representations. However, standalone TS predictors lack robustness, whereas heuristic-based approaches lack scalability, limiting their applicability to reliable high-throughput reaction discovery under distribution shifts. Here, we present a generative machine learning framework embedded within a fully automated TS search pipeline and demonstrate accelerated high-throughput screening of bioorthogonal click reactions as a representative case study. The automated framework enables scalable exploration of large reaction spaces and progressively learns, reducing the number of required quantum mechanical evaluations as additional reactions are processed. In our case study, generative refinement decreased the required TS optimization cycles by nearly 40% after training on only 544 reactions. By coupling generative modeling with physics-based validation in a scalable workflow, our work establishes a framework for data-driven reaction mechanism exploration and advances the development of autonomous computational discovery of chemical reactivity.

Identifiers

PMID42769678
PMCPMC13592236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.