ArticlePediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition2026
Effectiveness of Sulfasalazine Therapy Following Mesalazine Treatment Failure in Children with Ulcerative Colitis.
Article in Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of sulfasalazine therapy in children with ulcerative colitis (UC) after mesalazine treatment failure and to compare its effectiveness with that of mesalazine and azathioprine used after the first relapse. Methods: Data from all children newly diagnosed with UC between January 2010 and December 2021 who had at least 12 months of follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Of 189 children newly diagnosed with UC, 99 (52.4%) were treated with mesalazine alone, experienced a relapse, and were included in the study. The mean age was 12.8 years (standard deviation, 0.45), and 56 patients (56.6%) were male. After relapse, 35 children (35.4%) switched to sulfasalazine. Sulfasalazine treatment was effective in 28 patients (80.0%), and 19 patients (54.3%) remained relapse-free at 12 months. Patients who switched to sulfasalazine had more extensive disease and a higher Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index than those who continued mesalamine treatment, but both disease extent and the index were lower than in patients who received azathioprine. Relapse-free survival did not differ among mesalazine, sulfasalazine, and azathioprine treatments ( Conclusion: Switching from mesalazine to sulfasalazine may be a viable therapeutic option for carefully selected children with mild to moderate UC, even after mesalazine treatment failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.