ArticleOxford open digital health2026
Governing digital health transformation in South Africa: are policies, standards, and legislation fit for purpose?
Article in Oxford open digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines the legislative and regulatory governance mechanisms influencing digital health transformation within Provincial Departments of Health in South Africa. It aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of existing legislative, regulatory, and policy frameworks in supporting digital health implementation and to develop a Provincial Digital Health Governance and Implementation Model to strengthen governance across provincial health departments. A qualitative multiple case study design, underpinned by the interpretivist paradigm, was employed. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with Chief Information Officers and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Managers from six Provincial Departments of Health and complemented by content analysis of key legislative, regulatory, and policy documents. Data were analysed thematically. The findings indicate that South Africa has established comprehensive legislative, regulatory, and policy frameworks to support digital health transformation; however, implementation remains inconsistent across provinces. Although these frameworks provide a foundation for digital health governance, their effectiveness is constrained by weak implementation mechanisms, limited institutional capacity, inconsistent ICT governance, inadequate infrastructure, insufficient digital skills, fragmented interoperability, and uneven compliance with information governance and information security standards. The study demonstrates that the principal challenge is not the absence of legislative and policy frameworks, but the governance capacity required for effective implementation. In response, the study proposes a Provincial Digital Health Governance and Implementation Model that integrates legislative and regulatory frameworks, health standards, institutional policies, governance structures, and implementation mechanisms to strengthen coordination, accountability, interoperability, regulatory compliance, and institutional readiness. The study contributes to digital health governance literature by providing a contextually relevant governance framework to support sustainable digital health transformation within South Africa's provincial healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.