Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42769639›Full record

ArticleOxford open digital health2026

Governing digital health transformation in South Africa: are policies, standards, and legislation fit for purpose?

Mandisa Msomi, Ngoako Marutha

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Oxford open digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mandisa MsomiDepartment of Information Science, University of South Africa (UNISA), Muckleneuk Campus, Preller Street, Muckleneuk Ridge, Pretoria, Gauteng 0002, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5751-9765
Ngoako MaruthaDepartment of Information Science, University of South Africa (UNISA), Muckleneuk Campus, Preller Street, Muckleneuk Ridge, Pretoria, Gauteng 0002, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5679-4394

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines the legislative and regulatory governance mechanisms influencing digital health transformation within Provincial Departments of Health in South Africa. It aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of existing legislative, regulatory, and policy frameworks in supporting digital health implementation and to develop a Provincial Digital Health Governance and Implementation Model to strengthen governance across provincial health departments. A qualitative multiple case study design, underpinned by the interpretivist paradigm, was employed. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with Chief Information Officers and Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Managers from six Provincial Departments of Health and complemented by content analysis of key legislative, regulatory, and policy documents. Data were analysed thematically. The findings indicate that South Africa has established comprehensive legislative, regulatory, and policy frameworks to support digital health transformation; however, implementation remains inconsistent across provinces. Although these frameworks provide a foundation for digital health governance, their effectiveness is constrained by weak implementation mechanisms, limited institutional capacity, inconsistent ICT governance, inadequate infrastructure, insufficient digital skills, fragmented interoperability, and uneven compliance with information governance and information security standards. The study demonstrates that the principal challenge is not the absence of legislative and policy frameworks, but the governance capacity required for effective implementation. In response, the study proposes a Provincial Digital Health Governance and Implementation Model that integrates legislative and regulatory frameworks, health standards, institutional policies, governance structures, and implementation mechanisms to strengthen coordination, accountability, interoperability, regulatory compliance, and institutional readiness. The study contributes to digital health governance literature by providing a contextually relevant governance framework to support sustainable digital health transformation within South Africa's provincial healthcare system.

Indexed as

digital health governancedigital health transformationhealth information governanceICT governanceinteroperabilitypolicy and regulatory frameworkprovincial health departmentsSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID42769639
PMCPMC13592159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.