Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42769630›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026

Artificial intelligence in endometrial cancer: multimodal deep learning and future perspectives in precision gynecologic oncology - a structured narrative review.

Erik Lajtman, Michaela Miškovičová, Peter Dobročan, Alexandra Pôbišová, Rastislav Sysák

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erik LajtmanDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty Hospital Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia.
Michaela MiškovičováFaculty of Social Sciences and Health Care, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia.
Peter DobročanDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty Hospital Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia.
Alexandra PôbišováDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty Hospital Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia.
Rastislav Sysák1st Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy in developed countries, with a rising incidence driven by obesity, metabolic syndrome, diabetes mellitus, and aging populations. Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly advanced in gynecologic oncology, particularly in diagnostic imaging, digital pathology, radiomics, and multimodal prognostic modeling. Recent breakthroughs in machine learning, deep learning, and whole-slide imaging (WSI), including multimodal prognostic architectures such as HECTOR and explainable AI (XAI), have enabled the development of sophisticated diagnostic and prognostic systems. These systems can differentiate benign from malignant lesions, predict myometrial invasion and lymph node metastases, stratify recurrence risk, and support individualized therapeutic decision-making. Notably, recent multimodal deep-learning models, particularly the HECTOR framework, have demonstrated improved prognostic performance compared with conventional clinicopathologic risk-stratification systems for predicting distant recurrence in externally validated cohorts, although further prospective validation remains necessary. Despite these promising advances, current evidence remains limited by predominantly retrospective study designs, relatively small and frequently imbalanced datasets, potential overfitting of AI models, heterogeneous imaging protocols, limited external validation, and insufficient prospective clinical evidence. These limitations restrict model generalizability across different populations and healthcare settings. Furthermore, ethical, regulatory, and data-governance challenges remain important barriers to widespread clinical implementation. This structured narrative review summarizes AI applications in endometrial cancer, focusing on ultrasound imaging, radiomics, digital pathology, multimodal deep-learning, explainable AI, prognostic modeling, clinical translation, and future perspectives in personalized care.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedeep learningendometrial cancermultimodal AIprecision oncologyradiomicswhole-slide imaging

Identifiers

PMID42769630
PMCPMC13592089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.