ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Biomarkers in axial spondyloarthritis diagnosis: from clinical signs to multi-omics integration.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease primarily affecting the sacroiliac joints and spine, with an estimated global prevalence of 0.3-1.5%. Despite advances in classification criteria and imaging techniques, diagnostic delay remains a persistent clinical challenge, with patients waiting a median of 2-6 years from symptom onset to confirmed diagnosis. Biomarkers-broadly categorized into clinical, molecular, and imaging modalities-offer the potential to shorten this diagnostic gap by providing objective, quantifiable, and earlier indicators of disease. This narrative review maps the current landscape of biomarkers for the diagnosis of axSpA across all three modalities, with particular attention to how machine learning and multi-omics integration are reshaping the diagnostic paradigm. We examine established clinical markers (HLA-B27, inflammatory back pain criteria, C-reactive protein), survey the molecular biomarker literature spanning genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and liquid biopsy, and trace the imaging trajectory from conventional radiography and MRI through to radiomics and deep learning models that now approach the performance of expert radiologists. We further explore multimodal fusion-the integration of clinical, molecular, and imaging biomarkers into unified diagnostic models-and identify barriers to clinical translation: the lack of prospective external validation, inconsistent standardization, and unresolved questions about algorithmic fairness across diverse populations. We conclude that biomarker-driven precision diagnosis in axSpA requires continued biomarker discovery alongside the construction of shared infrastructure-multi-modal datasets, standardized pipelines, and prospective validation cohorts-to integrate existing and emerging biomarkers into clinically deployable tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.