ReviewArchives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation2026
Evaluating the Effectiveness and Technique Composition of Combined Motor Learning and Behavior Change Strategies for Movement Behavior in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Systematic Review.
Review in Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This review assessed the effectiveness of combined motor learning (ML) and behavior change (BC) strategies on movement behavior in daily life for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) and analyzed the applied techniques. Data sources: Literature was searched in PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase databases. Study selection: The following eligibility criteria were formulated: randomized controlled trials and clinical controlled trials, adults with CMP, movement interventions consisting of ML and BC strategies, and movement behavior or activities in daily life as outcome measures. We used ASReview software for screening. Data extraction: Two reviewers extracted data and independently assessed the risk of bias of the studies included. A best evidence synthesis was conducted for effectiveness and technique analysis with frameworks for the applied techniques. Data synthesis: Nineteen papers were selected. Moderate evidence was found in favor of the combined strategies on the quality, and insufficient evidence on the quantity of movement behavior. For activities of daily life, inconsistent evidence was found. The ML techniques reflected a more explicit learning approach. A small portion of BC techniques were applied, such as goal setting and shaping knowledge. Conclusions: Evidence of the effectiveness of combined strategies is moderate for the quality of movement, insufficient for the quantity of movement, and inconsistent for activities of daily life. The studies used a limited set of ML and BC techniques. Interventions for CMP should apply a more diverse set of techniques and use movement behavior as an outcome measure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.