Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42769524›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Comparative Evaluation of Intranasal Ketamine and Midazolam for Premedication in Children Undergoing Elective Surgery: A Prospective Study.

Vishal P Singh, Kanika Sachdeva, Nigar Bari, Ashutosh Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vishal P SinghDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Dehradun, IND.
Kanika SachdevaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Dehradun, IND.
Nigar BariDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Dehradun, IND.
Ashutosh SinghDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Dehradun, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreoperative anxiety can adversely affect anesthetic induction and perioperative outcomes in children. Intranasal ketamine and midazolam are commonly used noninvasive premedication agents, but evidence comparing their efficacy remains inconsistent. This study compared intranasal ketamine and midazolam in children undergoing elective surgery.

methodsThis prospective comparative study was conducted in the Department of Anesthesiology, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Dehradun, India, between August 2023 and July 2025. Seventy-two American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I children aged three to eight years scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were included. Seventy-two children were assigned alternately, with 36 receiving intranasal ketamine (5 mg/kg) and 36 receiving intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg). Sedation, onset of sedation, child-parent separation, preoperative anxiety, mask acceptance during induction, perioperative hemodynamic parameters, and adverse events were assessed using standardized clinical scales.

resultsBaseline demographic characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The ketamine group demonstrated a significantly shorter onset of sedation than the midazolam group (4.06 ± 0.86 vs. 7.47 ± 1.61 minutes, p < 0.001). Following premedication, Ramsay Sedation Scale scores were significantly higher in the ketamine group, with deep sedation at 20 minutes observed in 19 (52.8%) children compared with nine (25.0%) in the midazolam group (p < 0.001). Child-parent separation was significantly better with ketamine, with excellent separation observed in 30 (83.3%) children compared with two (5.6%) in the midazolam group (p < 0.001). Children receiving ketamine also demonstrated lower preoperative anxiety, with 22 (61.1%) remaining calm and cooperative compared with eight (22.2%) in the midazolam group (p < 0.001), and better mask acceptance during anesthetic induction, with excellent or good acceptance observed in 32 (88.9%) vs. 17 (47.2%) children, respectively (p < 0.001). Heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure, and oxygen saturation remained comparable between the groups at most perioperative time points. Ketamine was associated with a lower intraoperative heart rate and higher oxygen saturation after premedication. Mild intraoperative excessive secretions occurred in four (11.1%) children receiving ketamine compared with 0 (0.0%) in the midazolam group, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.115). Postoperative secretions were more frequent with ketamine, occurring in six (16.7%) children compared with 0 (0.0%) in the midazolam group (p = 0.025), whereas postoperative restlessness occurred in seven (19.4%) vs. eight (22.2%) children (p = 0.772). No child in either group experienced postoperative nausea or vomiting, with 0 (0.0%) cases in both groups.

conclusionsIn this prospective comparative study, intranasal ketamine was associated with faster onset and deeper sedation, better child-parent separation, and better mask acceptance than midazolam, with generally stable cardiorespiratory parameters. Postoperative secretions were more frequent with ketamine. Given the alternate allocation, potential unblinding, fixed assessment time, and small single-center sample, these findings are hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger randomized multicenter studies.

Indexed as

general anesthesiaintranasal ketamineintranasal midazolampediatric premedicationsedation

Identifiers

PMID42769524
PMCPMC13591436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.