ArticlePNAS nexus2026
The global structure of classroom social networks predicts academic and psychosocial adjustment.
Article in PNAS nexus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans are deeply social, and in early life, classroom friendships shape academic and socio-emotional development. Classroom peer ecologies describe the social structure in which individual relationships are situated and which form the context for student learning and development within these classrooms. Yet, research has only begun to explore how these global social network structures are related to classroom-level outcomes. Using a large-scale dataset of 35,038 students in 1,433 classrooms, we extracted 314 social network metrics from four different network types (i.e. friendship, rejection, help, and break-time contacts) and applied machine learning to predict various classroom-level outcomes, including academic achievement, motivation, and social integration. Classroom networks predicted both academic achievement (up to 2% of variance) and well-being (up to 18% of variance), beyond school tracks, socioeconomic status, and demographic factors. However, they did not significantly improve predictions for other characteristics of the teaching and learning environment-such as instructional methods and motivational characteristics. The predictive power for different outcomes was highly dependent upon the type of network and categories of network metrics. These insights position social networks as a powerful tool for understanding aspects of educational environments and for informing network-based interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.