ArticleAphasiology2026
The Aphasia Physical EXercise (APEX) study: feasibility of a new high-intensity functional interval training for stroke survivors with aphasia.
Article in Aphasiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Converging evidence suggests that physical exercise promotes motor and cognitive recovery after stroke, yet its potential to support language outcomes in people with aphasia remains largely unexplored. Additionally, there is a lack of structured, high-intensity and accessible exercise programs that foster adherence among stroke survivors. Aims: This pilot study evaluated the feasibility and explored the preliminary effects of a novel High-Intensity Functional Interval InterVention (HI-FIIV) program for stroke survivors with aphasia. Methods & Procedures: This Phase 1, proof of concept, pilot feasibility study employed a single-group, pre-test/post-test observational quantitative design. Seven individuals with mild-to-moderate aphasia completed an 8-week, thrice-weekly HI-FIIV intervention. Safety, adherence, and satisfaction were documented. Pre- and post-intervention assessments included standardized measures of language, cognition, and physical fitness. Outcomes & Results: The program was safe, well tolerated, and achieved high adherence (97.9% attendance). Participants reported high satisfaction (mean 9.6/10). Positive changes were observed on several higher-level language measures, including sentence comprehension and fluency, as well as on cognitive tasks targeting selective attention and working memory. Aerobic endurance increased significantly, and greater fitness gains were associated with larger changes in fluency and comprehension. Conclusions: This feasibility trial demonstrated that people with aphasia can safely participate in high-intensity group exercise and show patterns of selective improvement in language and cognition. While preliminary, the observed relationship between cardiovascular endurance and specific improvements in language suggests that exercise-induced gains in aerobic fitness may support recovery in post-stroke aphasia. Overall, by targeting physical, cognitive, and linguistic domains simultaneously, the HI-FIIV program represents a promising candidate for further investigation as an augmentative approach for post-stroke rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.