ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
From intention to action: student and faculty perspectives on private and public campus pro-environmental behavior.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Universities increasingly promote sustainability, yet environmental intentions do not consistently become private or public action. This qualitative study examined how university students and faculty in eastern China understood the personal, social, pedagogical, and institutional conditions shaping campus pro-environmental behavior. Four focus groups with 20 undergraduate and graduate students from arts and science disciplines and 10 semi-structured faculty interviews were analyzed using a hybrid deductive-inductive framework approach informed by an institutionally situated extended Theory of Planned Behavior. Six interrelated themes showed that intention was necessary but conditional on situated agency, habit, workload, convenience, health, safety, and institutional support. Perceived behavioral control was analytically distinguished from institutional reliability: the former concerned participants' appraisals of capability and opportunity, whereas the latter concerned whether facilities, procedures, information, and response systems actually worked. Public participation additionally required collective efficacy grounded in student voice, visible outcomes, organizational continuity, and institutional responsiveness. Environmental knowledge became actionable when local, practical, and linked to meaningful opportunities. Co-designed living laboratories emerged as a participant-generated proposal, not an intervention conducted in the study. The findings explain how curriculum, operations, and governance jointly condition private and public environmental action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.