Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42769459›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

From intention to action: student and faculty perspectives on private and public campus pro-environmental behavior.

Xiangen Chen, Jinyan Huang, Xisheng Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiangen Chen *Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Jinyan Huang *Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Xisheng Huang *Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Universities increasingly promote sustainability, yet environmental intentions do not consistently become private or public action. This qualitative study examined how university students and faculty in eastern China understood the personal, social, pedagogical, and institutional conditions shaping campus pro-environmental behavior. Four focus groups with 20 undergraduate and graduate students from arts and science disciplines and 10 semi-structured faculty interviews were analyzed using a hybrid deductive-inductive framework approach informed by an institutionally situated extended Theory of Planned Behavior. Six interrelated themes showed that intention was necessary but conditional on situated agency, habit, workload, convenience, health, safety, and institutional support. Perceived behavioral control was analytically distinguished from institutional reliability: the former concerned participants' appraisals of capability and opportunity, whereas the latter concerned whether facilities, procedures, information, and response systems actually worked. Public participation additionally required collective efficacy grounded in student voice, visible outcomes, organizational continuity, and institutional responsiveness. Environmental knowledge became actionable when local, practical, and linked to meaningful opportunities. Co-designed living laboratories emerged as a participant-generated proposal, not an intervention conducted in the study. The findings explain how curriculum, operations, and governance jointly condition private and public environmental action.

Indexed as

campus sustainabilitycollective efficacyinstitutionally situated agencyinstitutional reliabilityliving laboratoriesprivate and public pro-environmental behavior

Identifiers

PMID42769459
PMCPMC13590792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.