ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Immunotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer: current status and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are aggressive, molecularly heterogeneous malignancies, and most patients present with unresectable or metastatic disease at diagnosis. For more than a decade, gemcitabine-platinum chemotherapy served as the first-line standard of care, with only modest survival benefit. The phase 3 TOPAZ-1 and KEYNOTE-966 trials have now established chemoimmunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors as the new standard front-line regimen, and the phase 2 IMbrave151 trial is evaluating whether adding antiangiogenic therapy provides further benefit. Nonetheless, only a minority of patients derive durable clinical benefit from immunotherapy. Conventional predictive biomarkers-deficient mismatch repair or high microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, and PD-L1 expression-have limited discriminatory value in BTC, largely because of profound intratumoral heterogeneity. Emerging biomarkers and composite multi-feature models show greater promise for refining patient stratification. Investigational modalities, including therapeutic cancer vaccines, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, have shown preliminary antitumor activity but require validation in larger cohorts. Multiple combination regimens aimed at reversing the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment are under active investigation, and disease-specific protocols for managing hepatobiliary immune-related adverse events remain an unmet clinical need. In this review, we synthesize the latest evidence on biomarkers, clinical trials, combination strategies, cellular therapies, and safety management for immunotherapy in advanced BTC, and we highlight persistent challenges and future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.