ArticleCureus2026
Clinical Profile of Ingested Foreign Bodies in Children: A Single-Center Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, types, and locations of foreign bodies, as well as the clinical manifestations and outcomes following endoscopic extraction in pediatric patients. Methodology This prospective observational study included 75 children aged 0-12 years who presented with suspected foreign body ingestion at the Medical Trust Hospital, Kochi, Kerala, India. Detailed clinical histories, physical examinations, radiographic assessments, and endoscopic findings were recorded and analyzed. Results This study included 75 patients, including 35 (46.7%) males and 40 (53.3%) females. A statistically significant association was observed between gender and the site of impaction (p = 0.012). Lower esophageal involvement was noted in seven (20.0%) males and seven (17.5%) females. Foreign bodies were detected and endoscopically managed in 50 (66.7%) patients. A sensation of a foreign body was reported in 21 (84.0%) females and 12 (48.0%) males (p = 0.043). Coins were the most common objects, predominantly lodged in the post-cricoid region and the esophagus, whereas food impactions occurred exclusively in the esophagus, and needles were found in the stomach and duodenum. Endoscopic removal was successful in all cases within 24 hours, with no major complications. Five (6.7%) patients required a hospital stay of three days because of minor mucosal ulceration, which resolved with conservative management. Conclusions Foreign body ingestion is common among toddlers due to exploratory behavior and inadequate supervision. Coins and fish bones are the most frequently ingested items, with impaction sites and clinical presentations varying significantly by gender. Early diagnosis and prompt endoscopic removal are crucial for preventing complications. Public awareness and parental education play a vital role in reducing the incidence of these cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.