ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
A camera calibration method driven by unmanned aerial vehicles and high-precision estimation of maize SPAD values under adverse conditions.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid and non-destructive monitoring of maize SPAD is important for precision water and nitrogen management in arid irrigation areas. This study developed a UAV-smartphone cross-device calibration framework for SPAD estimation using UAV multispectral imagery, smartphone RGB images, and ground-measured SPAD data collected at the jointing, tasseling, and grain-filling stages. Spectral and texture features were integrated for UAV-based modeling, and regularized least-squares calibration was used to map smartphone-derived features into the UAV feature space. The random forest model using combined spectral and texture features achieved the best UAV-based performance, with validation R² values of 0.81, 0.79, and 0.75 across the three growth stages, representing an improvement of more than 9% over single-feature models. After cross-device calibration, smartphone-based SPAD estimation achieved R² values of 0.80, 0.86, and 0.82, respectively. These results demonstrate that cross-device feature calibration can effectively bridge UAV multispectral and smartphone RGB observations, providing a low-cost and accurate approach for field-scale maize SPAD monitoring and precision water-nitrogen management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.