Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42769426›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026

Machine learning models in predicting antimicrobial resistance in gonorrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

David Chinaecherem Innocent, Rejoicing Chijindum Innocent, Increase Praise Innocent

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David Chinaecherem InnocentCenticini Research Lab, Centicini, Abuja, Nigeria.
Rejoicing Chijindum InnocentCenticini Research Lab, Centicini, Abuja, Nigeria.
Increase Praise InnocentCenticini Research Lab, Centicini, Abuja, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The global rise in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning models in predicting antimicrobial resistance in Methods: A comprehensive search of seven databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar was conducted for studies published up to 2025. Eligible studies applied ML algorithms to genomic, phenotypic, or epidemiological datasets for predicting AMR in Results: Five eligible studies encompassing unique Conclusion: Machine learning models exhibit outstanding diagnostic accuracy in predicting AMR in

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialGonorrheaMachine LearningNeisseria gonorrhoeaeHumansPredictive Learning ModelsSensitivity and SpecificityAnti-Bacterial Agentsantimicrobial resistanceartificial intelligencediagnostic accuracymachine learningmeta-analysisNeisseria gonorrhoeaepredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID42769426
PMCPMC13590765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.