SynthesisFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Novel biofilm-targeted therapeutics for oral infections: enzymes, EPS disruptors, phage/CRISPR, photodynamic and cold-plasma approaches - a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Microbial biofilms underpin the chronicity, recurrence and antimicrobial tolerance of most oral infections. As mechanical and antibiotic strategies are constrained by antimicrobial resistance and by the protective biofilm matrix, non-antibiotic, biofilm-targeted therapeutics have attracted intense interest. We systematically mapped and appraised five mechanistically distinct modalities - matrix-degrading (anti-biofilm) enzymes, extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) disruptors, bacteriophage and CRISPR-based therapy, antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) and cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) - selected because each targets a different, non-antibiotic vulnerability of the biofilm. Methods: Following a PRISMA 2020 protocol (PROSPERO), PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus were searched from inception to January 2026. Results: Seventy-eight studies met the criteria; 58% (45/78) were Conclusion: On current evidence these modalities are best positioned as adjuncts that enhance, rather than replace, mechanical and antimicrobial therapy. Only aPDT currently has sufficient clinical evidence for consideration as an adjunct to conventional therapy; the remaining modalities remain investigational and require further translational and clinical development. Combination (matrix-first) strategies, targeted delivery, and standardised oral-biofilm models and clinical trials are priorities. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420261428848.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.