ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026
Long-term outcomes of spinal cord stimulation for refractory phantom limb pain.
Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a disabling post-amputation neuropathic pain condition, and evidence regarding the long-term effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) remains limited. This study evaluated trial stimulation outcomes, pain trajectories, device retention, explantation, and device-related complications in patients with refractory PLP. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 28 patients with refractory PLP who underwent SCS trial stimulation at our center between June 2010 and September 2023. Baseline characteristics, procedural data, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores, progression to permanent implantation, revision or replacement procedures, and device explantation were recorded. Changes in NRS scores from baseline were assessed, and exploratory regression analyses were performed. Results: Eighteen patients (64%) met the criteria for trial success and proceeded to permanent SCS implantation. In an exploratory analysis, a higher baseline NRS score was associated with trial success. Among the 18 patients with permanent implants, the median follow-up was 78 months. Five SCS systems (28%) were explanted: three because of inadequate pain relief and two after battery depletion without replacement. In a Conclusions: SCS provided substantial short-term pain relief in selected patients with refractory PLP. However, the magnitude of pain relief diminished over time, and device explantation occurred in a substantial minority of patients, underscoring the need for careful patient selection, long-term follow-up, and device management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.