Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42769216›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

Dual-region deep learning model integrating prostate and peri-prostatic adipose tissue MRI features for bone metastasis prediction in prostate cancer.

Peng Qin, Bohao Liu, Huabin Su, Ziqiao Wang, Zhengxu Lin, Weian Zhu, Chen Zou, Qian Cai, Jianjie Wu, Jiayu Zheng and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Peng Qin *Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Bohao Liu *Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Huabin Su *Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ziqiao WangDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhengxu LinDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Weian ZhuDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Chen ZouDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Qian CaiDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianjie WuDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiayu ZhengDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiao ZhaoDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xuan WenDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yun LuoDepartment of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: Bone metastasis (BM) is pivotal in prostate cancer (PCa) management. This study developed a multimodal model integrating MRI-derived deep features from the prostate gland (PG) and periprostatic adipose tissue (PPAT) with clinical variables for BM risk assessment. Methods: Retrospectively, 464 patients were recruited and randomly divided into training and internal test cohorts at a ratio of 7:3. Deep features were extracted from PG and PPAT regions on T2-weighted MRI using a pretrained ResNet-50 as a fixed feature extractor. Clinical, PG, and PPAT component models were developed using patient-level cross-validation. Their out-of-fold probabilities were integrated by a logistic-regression meta-learner to construct the Deep feature-based PG-PPAT-Clinical (DPPC) model. Model performance was evaluated using ROC-AUC, average precision, calibration analysis, decision-curve analysis, and SHAP analysis. Results: The DPPC model achieved ROC-AUCs of 0.922 (95% CI, 0.887-0.954) in the training cohort and 0.928 (95% CI, 0.864-0.978) in the internal test cohort. Its ROC-AUC was significantly higher than that of the Clinical model in the training cohort and the PPAT model in the internal test cohort, whereas the remaining pairwise differences were not statistically significant. At a probability threshold of 0.5, the internal-test sensitivity and specificity were 65.1% and 95.9%, respectively. The observed BM rates were 87.5% in the high-risk group and 13.9% in the low-risk group. Conclusion: By synergizing deep learning signatures from PG and PPAT with clinical factors, the DPPC model demonstrates promising performance for BM risk stratification, and external validation and further calibration assessment are required.

Indexed as

biomedical image processingbone metastasisdeep learningprediction modelprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID42769216
PMCPMC13590367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.